A team of 3 people who/which do/does all the work

Status
Not open for further replies.

BloodSweatTears

Junior Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2016
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
French
Home Country
France
Current Location
France
Hi,

What is the correct way of writing this sentence?

1- A team of three people which does all the work.

2- A team of three people who do all the work.
 
Last edited:

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
At the moment, they're both incorrect because there is no full stop at the end. You can click Edit Post and add them.
 

Rover_KE

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
Neither is a sentence, as there is no main verb.
 

Tdol

No Longer With Us (RIP)
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
In British English, you could make a case for both forms.
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
It depends whether you want the emphasis to be on the team (which) or the people (who). They both work.
 

BloodSweatTears

Junior Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2016
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
French
Home Country
France
Current Location
France
I've thought again about this sentence.

If I want to emphasis the team, isn't "A team of 3 people that does all the work" a better formulation than "A team of 3 people which does all the work"? Or are the two equivalent?
 

Tarheel

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2014
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
I think they are about the same. (It's not really a sentence. It is, in fact, a noun phrase.)
 

BloodSweatTears

Junior Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2016
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
French
Home Country
France
Current Location
France
There is no difference between the two.
I've read somewhere that it's better to put "that" when the words after the relative pronoun are necessary to the understanding of the sentence but it's better to put "which" when what follows isn't necessary to the understanding.

As an example:
- "It's a team of 3 people, which are all men, that does all the work". Because the sentence is still understandable without "which are all men" but isn't so without what follows "that".

Isn't that true?
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
It's a team of three people, who are all men ...
It's a team of three people, all of whom are men ...
 

Tdol

No Longer With Us (RIP)
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
Isn't that true?

We don't use that in relative clauses that simply offer extra information and don't define/restrict the meaning.

The man that/who interviewed me was very aggressive. (There are many men and this information is essential to tell you which man I am talking about.)

My brother, who works in London, is coming to visit next week. (I only have one brother, so the information about where he works is an extra detail thrown in.)

When the information is an extra details, it is separated off from the rest of the sentence by commas.

BTW, with your example, you should use who are all men​ IMO, not which are all men, as you are giving some extra information about the people, not the team.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top