failee

[beachboy]

How common is the word failee in English? If not so common, how can I refer to students who have failed an exam?

 

[emsr2d2]

How common is the word failee in English? If not so common, how can I refer to students who have failed an exam?

I have never heard the term before, nor can I find it in any online dictionary or in my Chambers Dictionary.

I would say you have to refer to them as "students who failed an exam"!

 

[gregnunn]

I've been teaching English for forty years and never heard of 'failee'.

 

[euncu]

As far as I am concerned, to most people who are native or non-native speakers, the meaning of the word is understood even if it doesn't exist in English. So, I think it (deriving nouns by adding -ee) is one of those things that the teachers won't like. (I hope my last sentence didn't sound as controversial as it reads :-? )

 

[Rover_KE]

Beachboy,

My recommendation is that you do not use failee.

Rover

 

[emsr2d2]

I agree with Rover. Just because the meaning of a made-up word can be worked out from the context and from the use of a particular suffix or prefix, doesn't mean that it should be used.

 

[BobK]

As far as I am concerned, to most people who are native or non-native speakers, the meaning of the word is understood even if it doesn't exist in English. So, I think it (deriving nouns by adding -ee) is one of those things that the teachers won't like. (I hope my last sentence didn't sound as controversial as it reads :-? )

No problem ;-)

English has for a long time borrowed words from French, ending '-ee', typically with a passive sense: an employee is employed. However, there were two exceptions to this passive sense, deriving from pseudo-reflexives: escapee (someone who s'est échappée) and refugee (someone who s'est refugiée - we are all feminine in the world of these borrowings!)

Having recognized this pattern, I assumed (wrongly) when I first heard 'retiree' that it meant 'someone who had been (involuntarily) retired'. But the pattern just doesn't fit what's happening in the language; 'retiree' was just the first (in my experience) of many new coinings in which this suffix just means 'someone doing something'. I had to come to terms with the word 'attendees' when I worked for an American-owned company; this word is now commonly used in UK industry; ('come to terms with' doesn't mean 'use' - there are always ways round a word that sticks in one's craw. ;-))

But I agree both that it's not advisable to use 'failee' and that - in the linguistic climate that accepts that <any-verb>+'ee' means doer - it will be widely understood.

As emsr2d2 said, you could say 'students who failed'. Or, as the heading of a list of students who failed, you could use any of the words 'Failures', 'failed', or 'fail/s'; that 's' might be contentious, but it would be perfectly clear if students in a class of 26, looking at a list on results day, said 'We got 1 Distinction, 2 Merits, 23 passes, and no fails' - a (countable) 'fail' (in my [possibly iconoclastic view ;-)] is a result of 'Fail'.

b

 

[BobK]

Afterthought: another of those pesky reflexives - only this time the French doesn't have an -ée anyway: 'absentee' -> someone who s'est absenti; but the vowel sound is closer - I wonder which came first, 'absentee' or employee'? I feel a trip to the OED coming on...

There is even the jocular analogue 'presentee' - someone who just puts his time in but isn't a productive worker; needless to say, this is an informal usage.

b