first/earliest

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Dec 18, 2020
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
China
Current Location
China
Hello, everyone. Is either 'first' or 'earliest' correct?

London is the first/earliest of these cities to have its own railway networks.

 
I'm pretty sure you mean first.

Why are you using is? Can you give us a bit more context?
 
I'm pretty sure you mean first.

Why are you using is? Can you give us a bit more context?
Thanks, jutfrank. Yes, I mean 'first'. But is 'earliest' correct?

Please see the chart and let me know whether I should use 'is' or 'was'.
rail.jpeg
 
Use first and was.
 
Use first and was.
Thanks, but I don't know why 'was' should be used. London is still the first one to have its own network, isn't it? Could you explain?
 
It makes much more sense to talk about the opening of these railway networks as past events.

You can say that London's network is the oldest, but you need to say that London's network was the first to open.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top