I met you before/I have met you before

Status
Not open for further replies.

Andromeda

Junior Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2020
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
Dear teachers,


I came across a book called "Better Ways with Verbs" by John Platt. In a chapter on "tenses", two characters are in conversation:


Irene: Oh, I met you before.
Peter: Yes, you have met me before. We met last week at Josie's party.


According to the author, "it would have been better for Irene to have said: 'Oh, I've met you before' as she is counting meetings up to the present time.


My question is, as "before" clearly denotes the period of time preceding the present, why can't it be in the simple past tense whether or not the meeting has any relevance to the present.


Thank you very much.
 
The difference between the past simple and the present perfect is something that confuses many learners. Sometimes, it's just a case of learning patterns.

I met you last week.
I met you in 2018.
I met you at 10pm.

I have met you before.
I have met you twice.
I have met you many times.

In the examples above, you will notice that the past simple is followed by a specific time reference, and that the present perfect is followed by a less specific time reference. It gets a bit more complicated when two time references are used together. For example:

I met you twice in 2018.
I met you many times when we both lived in Porto.

As you can see, the specific time references ("in 2018" and "when we both lived in Porto") take precedence, leading to the past simple being used.

(I'm sure an experienced grammarian can explain it much better than that!)
 
The author says it would have been better to use the present perfect. The author does not say it is wrong to use the past. I agree with the author.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
My question is, as "before" clearly denotes the period of time preceding the present, why can't it be in the simple past tense whether or not the meeting has any relevance to the present.

With the present perfect, the present relevance is shown. With the past simple, no present relevance is shown.

In this example, the present perfect is better for precisely that reason.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ask a Teacher

If you have a question about the English language and would like to ask one of our many English teachers and language experts, please click the button below to let us know:

(Requires Registration)
Back
Top