If I had my bike

[FalaGringo]

Your bike has broken and you have left it at home, you are walking home right now and think to yourself...

"If I had my bike I would be at home by now."
"If I had my bike I would have been at home by now."

Are both of these sentences correct in this kind of situation?
I would probably say the second one.
"

 

[Yankee]

Your bike has broken and you have left it at home, you are walking home right now and think to yourself...

"If I had my bike I would be at home by now."
"If I had my bike I would have been at home by now."

Are both of these sentences correct in this kind of situation? Yes.
I would probably say the second one. Agree.

Y.

"

 

[emsr2d2]

You need a comma after "If I had my bike".

 

[Tarheel]

I would probably say:
.
If I had my bike I would be home now.

 

[emsr2d2]

I would probably say:
.
If I had my bike I would be home now.

As I said in post #3, you need a comma after "my bike".

 

[Tdol]

I would use the first too, with the comma.

 

[5jj]

Your bike has broken
"

I am not a cyclist, but I'm fairly sure they don't speak of their bikes being 'broken'.

 

[jutfrank]

Neither sentence really makes proper sense. It seems to me that you're confusing different thoughts:

If I'd cycled (instead of walked), I'd have already arrived home.

This sentence expresses a past action and past result.

If I'd cycled, I'd be home now.

This is a past action and present result.

If I had my bike with me, I'd be able to cycle home.

This is a present situation and present consequence (what logically follows).