[Grammar] Infinitive or Gerundium/progressve or simple past

Status
Not open for further replies.

Søren

New member
Joined
Feb 15, 2012
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
Danish
Home Country
Denmark
Current Location
Denmark
Dear English Teachers,

(A) Is there grammar rule dictating whether one should use "to see" (infinitive) or "seeing" (gerund) in the following sentence?:

(1) It's a pleasure to see you you again.

(2) It's a pleasure seeing you again.

(B) Is there a error in # (1), which is a decontextualised sentence; or is # (2) orecorrect?:

(1) The child whose parents died is living with his aunt.

(2) The child whose parents died lives with his aunt.

I hope you can help me!

Best wishes,
Søren
 
***** NOT A TEACHER *****


Hello, Soren:

(1) One book says this:

"There is not much difference in meaning between -ing and the to infinitive: -ing may refer to an action in progress, whereas

the to-infintive may imply 'in general':

It's difficult finding your way around in a strange city.
It's difficult to find your way around in a strange city."

Source: L.G. Alexander, Longman English Grammar (London and New York: Longman, 1988), p. 317.

(2) Another book says:

(a) The gerund is "more immediate and more vivid": I like camping in the mountains.

(b) The infinitive is more remote and more objective: I like to camp in the mountains.

Source: Marianne Celce-Murcia and Diane Larsen-Freeman, The Grammar Book (Rowley, London, and Tokyo: Newbury House Publishers, Inc., 1983), p. 436. The two authors also credit Professors Bolinger and So.


It is only my opinion that "It's a pleasure seeing you again" would be more emotional and affectionate than the "colder" "It's a

pleasure to see you again."



HAVE A NICE DAY!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ask a Teacher

If you have a question about the English language and would like to ask one of our many English teachers and language experts, please click the button below to let us know:

(Requires Registration)
Back
Top