Is it still natural to change "at first hand" into "directly" this sentence?

Status
Not open for further replies.

eggcracker

Member
Joined
May 14, 2012
Member Type
Other
Native Language
Korean
Home Country
Japan
Current Location
South Korea
Is it still natural to change "at first hand" into "directly" this sentence?

The President visited the area to see the devastation at first hand.
Is it natural and grammatical to change "at first hand" into "directly" or "on his eyes" above sentence?

 
Re: Is it still natural to change "at first hand" into "directly" this sentence?

The President visited the area to see the devastation at first hand.
Is it natural and grammatical to change "at first hand" into "directly" or "on his eyes" above sentence?


My first preference would be "first hand" ("at" is not necessary).
"Directly" is OK.
"On his eyes" is not a correct term, but you could use "with his own eyes".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ask a Teacher

If you have a question about the English language and would like to ask one of our many English teachers and language experts, please click the button below to let us know:

(Requires Registration)
Back
Top