JACEK1
Key Member
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2013
- Member Type
- Interested in Language
- Native Language
- Polish
- Home Country
- Poland
- Current Location
- Poland
Hello all members!
[FONT=659b3034bf4e337a0c9618a0#d40100]It is only after this hidden clearance has been accounted for, will the correct bumping clearance be found.
Although I am not a native speaker of English, I have some serious reservations about correctness of the above-mentioned sentence. In my opinion, the sentence should read as follows:
1. It is only after this hidden clearance has been accounted for that the correct bumping clearance will be found.
It would be a split sentence.
or
2. Only after this hidden clearance has been accounted for, will the correct bumping clearance be found.
It would be a case of inversion.
I may be wrong.
What do you think of the sentence under discussion?
Thank you.[/FONT]
[FONT=659b3034bf4e337a0c9618a0#d40100]It is only after this hidden clearance has been accounted for, will the correct bumping clearance be found.
Although I am not a native speaker of English, I have some serious reservations about correctness of the above-mentioned sentence. In my opinion, the sentence should read as follows:
1. It is only after this hidden clearance has been accounted for that the correct bumping clearance will be found.
It would be a split sentence.
or
2. Only after this hidden clearance has been accounted for, will the correct bumping clearance be found.
It would be a case of inversion.
I may be wrong.
What do you think of the sentence under discussion?
Thank you.[/FONT]
