it would be a major blow

Status
Not open for further replies.

Kontol

Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2021
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Javanese
Home Country
Indonesia
Current Location
Indonesia
How does "would" work in this sentence?

I look at a headline from the Mirror newspaper. The headline says "Ralf will adapt style for Ronaldo". "But knee injury fears for opener". Then the writer goes on to say:

"Ronaldo is a big doubt for Ralf Rangnick's debut in the Manchester United dugout as he nurses a knee injury. It would be a major blow for the new boss who vowed to adapt his tactics to get the best out of the talisman."

 
Last edited:
Context makes it clear that the absence of Ronaldo (if that were to happen) would be a blow for the boss.

The condition is implied.
 
Because the condition is hidden, I don't know whether it's "if that happens (type 1, therefore mixed) or "if that were to happen (pure type 2), which is correct?
 
The implication of the use of 'would' tells us it's the hypothetical type. The implied conditional clause is 'If that happened/were to happen'
 
But I'm sure the two forms are acceptable.

If the injury doesn't get better, it would be a major blow for United's new boss.
If the injury didn't/weren't to get better, it would be a major blow for United's new boss
 
I'm not sure you've quite understood what 5jj has said. Let me say it again. The implied hypothetical conditional is this:

If it were to be the case that Ronaldo is unfit to play, it would be a major blow for the new boss.

The first clause states a hypothetical state of affairs where Ronaldo's injury prevents him from starting. The second clause states the effect of this eventuality on Mr Rangnick. The first clause uses a past tense verb to show that it's hypothetical.
 
Last edited:
5jj is absolutely right!

Not a teacher
 
Last edited by a moderator:
But I'm sure the two forms are acceptable.

If the injury doesn't get better, it would be a major blow for United's new boss.
Although this mix of tenses is not rare in the spoken language, it would be better to regard this as less-than-perfect English rather than try to analyse precisely what it means.
 
5jj is absolutely right!
Welcome to the forum, Hunter Ashbolt. 5jj will be delighted to have your approval.

Please read this extract from the forum rules:

You are welcome to answer questions posted in the Ask a Teacher forum as long as your suggestions, help, and advice reflect a good understanding of the English language. If you are not a teacher, you will need to state that clearly in your posts. Please note, all posts are moderated by our in-house language experts, so make sure your suggestions, help, and advice house the kind of information an international language teacher would offer. If not, and your posts do not contribute to the topic in a positive way, they will be subject to deletion. Please remember, the person whose questions you are answering or whose thread you are contributing ideas to believes the help is coming from a teacher.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ask a Teacher

If you have a question about the English language and would like to ask one of our many English teachers and language experts, please click the button below to let us know:

(Requires Registration)
Back
Top