[Grammar] "must be" in reported speech

Status
Not open for further replies.

Iryn_

Junior Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2015
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Ukrainian
Home Country
Ukraine
Current Location
Ukraine
Hello, dear forum users!

He says, "It must be John who took it."
He said that it must've been John who had taken it.

Is the reported sentence correct?
*if not, what should it be?
 
Last edited:
The contraction must've is common in spoken English, but you should only use it in quotations in the written language. I wouldn't change the tense of the second verb: write It must have been John who took it.
 
It must have been John who took it.
He said that it must have been John who took it.
He said that it must have been John who had taken it.

All three are grammatically possible. I'm having trouble coming up with a convincing context in which to use the third.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top