no evidence of acute rejection on serial biopsy

Status
Not open for further replies.

GoodTaste

Key Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2016
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
China
Current Location
China
Pig Kidney Xenotransplantation
R.A. Montgomery and Others
Genetically modified pig kidney xenografts were transplanted into two brain-dead human recipients. The xenografts functioned immediately and showed no evidence of acute rejection on serial biopsy over a period of 54 hours. The serum creatinine level decreased in both recipients.

Source: The New England Journal of Medicine

1653464554533.png

It seems to me that the "serial biopsy" should have been "serial biopsies". Am I on the right track?
 
Apparently, the singular form is accepted in medical language. It is repeat biopsy on the same organ at short intervals on a patient.
 
Am I on the right track?
You're overusing this expression. It's not appropriate when the choice is simply between being right or not.
 
The word biopsy is being used uncountably here, referring to the procedure rather than to any particular instance of the procedure.
 
Last edited:
It seems to me that the "serial biopsy" should have been "serial biopsies". Am I on the right track?
Apparently, not to doctors. Many non-medical people would go for the plural, but we;d be thinking about individual tests rather than a process.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top