[Grammar] None of these advances was/were the result of luck alone.

Status
Not open for further replies.

wotcha

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
Korean
Home Country
South Korea
Current Location
South Korea
1. None of these advances was the result of luck alone.

2. None of these advances were the result of luck alone.


Depending on grammar books, the agreement between 'none' and verb differs.

Which is grammatical between 1 and 2 teachers?
 

nelson13

Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2012
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Zhuang
Home Country
Bangladesh
Current Location
Japan
1. None of these advances was the result of luck alone.

2. None of these advances were the result of luck alone.


Depending on grammar books, the agreement between 'none' and verb differs.

Which is grammatical between 1 and 2 teachers?

Both verbs are correct.

Samuel Johnson uses a plural verb for NONE and a 20-century grammarian considers it incorrect and says a singular verb should be used.

But when you read more you will find that many famous writers use a plural verb.
 

5jj

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Member Type
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Czech Republic
Current Location
Czech Republic
Both are fine these days.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top