restrictive/nonrestrictive relative clauses and comma

Status
Not open for further replies.

atabitaraf

Key Member
Joined
May 19, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Persian
Home Country
Iran
Current Location
Iran
It is what I found on Microsoft Word Help about the use of comma in relative clauses:

If these words (explanation) are not essential to the meaning of your sentence, use a comma and which.
Instead of: I have a great book which you can buy for your vacation.
Consider: I have a great book, which you can buy for your vacation.
Or: I have a great book that you can buy for your vacation.

I wondered how 'that' and 'which' could differ in the use of relative clauses. Do you confirm the claiming?
 
I suggest you take your grammar guidance from a source other than Microsoft Word Help, especially since you're a teacher.

  • Use that in defining relative clauses.
  • Use which in non-defining relative clauses.
Do you know what these two kinds of relative clause are?
 
Last edited:
I suggest you take your grammar guidance from a source other than Microsoft Word Help, especially since you're a teacher.

  • Use that in defining relative clauses.
  • Use which in non-defining relative clause
Do you know what these two kinds of relative clause are?
Thank you. Yes, I do. And how about the use of comma? I have learnt and teach that as long as it is restrictive/defining we do not need and we mustn't use comma. Otherwise we need a comma. I hope I do it right.
 
Right.
 
Thank you. Yes, I do. And how What about the use of a/the comma? I have learnt and teach that as long as it is restrictive/defining we do not need and we mustn't use a comma. Otherwise, we need a comma. I hope I do I'm doing it right.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top