Vaccine against the B.1.351 Variant

Status
Not open for further replies.

GoodTaste

Key Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2016
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
China
Current Location
China
Is "B.1.351" pronounced as "B point one point three five one"?

====================
Efficacy of the ChAdOx1 Vaccine against the B.1.351 Variant
BACKGROUND
Assessment of the safety and efficacy of vaccines against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in different populations is essential, as is investigation of the efficacy of the vaccines against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, including the B.1.351 (501Y.V2) variant first identified in South Africa.

Source: New England Journal of Medicine
 
Yes.

(not a virologist)
 
I'd skip the first point too. (Not a scientist, much less a virologist)
 
I haven't been paying close attention to the actual scientific designations, but the times I've heard the numbers instead of a geographical name (UK, South African, Wuhan, etc.), I don't recall news reports including the decimal points. I'm pretty sure they've just been using the alphanumeric combination sans decimals for brevity's sake, at least in US news coverage.
 
I don't know how people in the field read it, but my inclination is the same: I'd say bee one three fifty-one.
 
Rats! People have been stopping me in the street to ask me about this (at a safe distance, of course) and I've been giving them the wrong answer. :-(
 
I don't know how people in the field read it, but my inclination is the same: I'd say bee one three fifty-one.

Any scientist would get the meaning and non-scientists would too if they followed the news.
 
Unless there really are B.1.351, B.13.51, and B.135.1 variants to distinguish between, the decimals seem irrelevant anyway, at least from a pronunciation standpoint.
 
Unless there really are B.1.351, B.13.51, and B.135.1 variants to distinguish between, the decimals seem irrelevant anyway, at least from a pronunciation standpoint.
I'd read those as bee one three-fifty-one, bee thirteen fifty-one and bee one-thirty-five one, respectively.
 
Unless there really are B.1.351, B.13.51, and B.135.1 variants to distinguish between, the decimals seem irrelevant anyway, at least from a pronunciation standpoint.
I'd read those as bee one three-fifty-one, bee thirteen fifty-one and bee one-thirty-five one, respectively.
 
Unless there really are B.1.351, B.13.51, and B.135.1 variants to distinguish between, the decimals seem irrelevant anyway, at least from a pronunciation standpoint.

And who other than a particularly pedantic virologist would need to say b-point-one when they're all b-point-one?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ask a Teacher

If you have a question about the English language and would like to ask one of our many English teachers and language experts, please click the button below to let us know:

(Requires Registration)
Back
Top