A question of style rather than grammar.

Status
Not open for further replies.

5jj

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Czech Republic
Current Location
Czech Republic
I wrote this in another thread:

"[...] When the little girl first told my wife her chosen name, my wife, somewhat surprised, told her that it was a pretty-sounding name, but not possible. It was only when the girl insisted on her choice, and wrote it down, that my wife realised what was going on. My wife and I both spent some time trying to work on this little girl's name, without success. "

I didn't like repeating 'my wife' and 'the girl', but 'she' led to possible ambiguity. Any suggestions on improvement, apart from the rather formal 'the former' and 'the latter'?
 

Barb_D

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 12, 2007
Member Type
Other
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
So this little girl ("the party of the first part") told my wife ("the party of the second part")... Subsequently, the party of the first part ... at which point the party of the second part realized that the party of the first part...

Hmm. Maybe that's not better after all :)

You could give one of the females a name (even if it's fake) and then you'd only have one common noun.

But I found absolutely nothing off about the original. It didn't seem too repetitious to me at all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top