[Grammar] He along with ME/I is playing football.

[Sahil Dhankhar]

This is not my homework.

I am trying to understand if we use subject form or object form in such sentences.

He along with ME/I is playing football.
He unlike ME/I is playing football.
He guided by ME/I is playing football.
He rather than ME/I is playing football.
He accompanied by ME/I is playing football.
He in addition to ME/I is playing football.
He as well as ME/I is playing football.

Thanks in advance.

 

[jutfrank]

None of those sentences is correct.

After prepositions (along with/unlike/by/to/for), we always use an object.

 

[GoesStation]

None of these are natural. Say He and I are playing football.

 

[Sahil Dhankhar]

what about this one?

He as well as ME/I is playing football.

 

[teechar]

No. That doesn't work.

 

[Sahil Dhankhar]

And what about this?
He, no less than I is to blame.

 

[jutfrank]

And what about this?
He, no less than I is to blame.

Yes, that's a correct sentence but it sounds very formal and old-fashioned. And it needs a comma after I.

 

[GoesStation]

Yes, that's a correct sentence but it sounds very formal and old-fashioned. And it needs a comma after I.

A million native speakers would never utter that sentence in their entire lifetimes.

 

[Raymott]

A million native speakers would never utter that sentence in their entire lifetimes.

I think you could safely multiply that number by 300. That would leave 60 million who might say it, which I think is still too high.

 

[emsr2d2]

We might say "He is no less to blame than I [am]". I would use "He is as much to blame as I [am]".

 

[Sahil Dhankhar]

I know it, but I am learning British Grammar in its classic form.

 

[emsr2d2]

What do you consider to be its "classic form"? Why don't you want to learn how to speak English how native speakers use it?

 

[jutfrank]

I know it, but I am learning British Grammar in its classic form.

What do you mean by this? There is no 'British Grammar'.