I have confirmed you about your parcel ...

[output]

Is the following sentence correct and natural?

I have confirmed you about your parcel from Amazing that has been received.

 

[tedmc]

No. I'd replace "confirmed" with "informed".
You say you confirm something; you don't confirm a person.

 

[emsr2d2]

The whole thing seems very odd to me. If you've already informed someone of something (or confirmed it to them), why would you need to later tell them that you'd done so?

 

[emsr2d2]

@output In order for us to help you further, you need to give us some more context. Don't just rewrite your sentence. Tell us what's happening!

 

[output]

My friend will be visiting me at my country. He bought something from Amazon. He needs me to receive his parcel when the delivery address is stating my country. I'm just writing down the messages and then send to my friend his parcel has been received. Just make a statement that I want my friend to be known.

 

[tedmc]

I'd write: I have received your parcel from Amazon for you.

Keep it simple. The passive form is no good.There is no need to say anything about "informed/confirmed.

 

[PeterCW]

I'd write: I have received your parcel from Amazon for you.

Keep it simple. The passive form is no good.There is no need to say anything about "informed/confirmed.

I think that most native speakers would omit "for you". Even so your suggestion does sound rather formal for a message between friends. I would just say "your Amazon parcel has arrived".

 

[emsr2d2]

My friend will be visiting me at in my country. He bought something from Amazon. He needs me to receive his parcel when the delivery address is stating my country used my address for the delivery. I'm just writing down the messages and then send to telling my friend his parcel has been received delivered. I just make a statement that I want my friend him to be known know.

See above.