What context?hooshdar, why do you ignore repeated requests for more context? People who come fresh to your threads have no idea that you are talking about chess. I am not going to answer any more of your questions unless you give more information. Others may; that's up to them.
The context of having your threads closed/deleted if you won't cooperate.What context?ٌ
OK.It isw about chess.Yes.Any more context?The context of having your threads closed/deleted if you won't cooperate.![]()
Yes! Always tell us where you found your sentence, who wrote it, when and why. Anything that can be useful. Understand that, as the person who doesn't know what something means, you cannot know what is necessary for the answerer to give an answer. Therefore, you should provide as much information as possible. The more information you give, the better chance you have that what you have given is enough. And if there is not enough information to give a good answer, no good answer will be given.OK.It isw about chess.Yes.Any more context?
Yes! Always tell us where you found your sentence, who wrote it, when and why. Anything that can be useful. Understand that, as the person who doesn't know what something means, you cannot know what is necessary for the answerer to give an answer. Therefore, you should provide as much information as possible. The more information you give, the better chance you have that what you have given is enough. And if there is not enough information to give a good answer, no good answer will be given.
I googled this in 30 seconds: in terms of - Idioms - by the Free Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia.OK.In FIDE TRG(2010) Mikhail Gurevich wrote thus at the conclusion of a chapter on "Basic/Typical plans"..
I googled this in 30 seconds: in terms of - Idioms - by the Free Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia.
It's a poorly written sentence.
Why not "in relation to"?I also have readthe link you provided.But I feel that in terms of means "on the basis of" or "in the form of" not the one Cambridge dictionary® provided in that link.
My chess knowledge deems it natural to think on the basis of plans, as opposed to play with no plan.Why not "in relation to"?
If you have a question about the English language and would like to ask one of our many English teachers and language experts, please click the button below to let us know: