birdeen's call
VIP Member
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2010
- Member Type
- Student or Learner
- Native Language
- Polish
- Home Country
- Poland
- Current Location
- Poland
Is it correct to use the subjunctive after "so that"? Is the following sentence correct?
I've bought her a necklace so that she be happy.
I read somewhere it wasn't correct. I wasn't convinced by the arguments though.
I feel there are two kinds of so-thats, one used to talk about causes and effects, and one used to talk about purposes. I'll try to show what I mean on examples.
1. She bored them so that they fell asleep.
I've bought her a necklace so that she be happy.
I read somewhere it wasn't correct. I wasn't convinced by the arguments though.
I feel there are two kinds of so-thats, one used to talk about causes and effects, and one used to talk about purposes. I'll try to show what I mean on examples.
1. She bored them so that they fell asleep.
It wasn't her purpose to make them fall asleep. I think this sentence (if it's correct) can be reworded this way:
1a. She bored them so much that they fell asleep.
I understand that, since we're talking about facts here, we must use the indicative mood.
2. I'm going to tell a lot of jokes so that everybody listen/listens to me.
The purpose of my telling jokes is to make everybody listen to me. Should I use the subjunctive or the indicative? Or maybe neither is correct and I should use "would listen"?
The idea of using the subjunctive here is appealing to me. In my language, we use the same structure here as we do in cases in which the subjunctive is correct in English. Also it seems to me that it nicely deals with the problem of the ambiguity of "so that" (about whose existence I may be wrong of course).
The idea of using the subjunctive here is appealing to me. In my language, we use the same structure here as we do in cases in which the subjunctive is correct in English. Also it seems to me that it nicely deals with the problem of the ambiguity of "so that" (about whose existence I may be wrong of course).