I've no intent of escalating the original point, (maybe a mod could break part of the thread out into General Discussion or other appreciate forum) but would like to point out that Popri's question is understandably based on a
real linguistic phenomenon in Japanese -
Gender differences in Japanese, which was an interesting revelation to me.
Lots of languages tie grammatical aspects to gender. With Navajo, active verbs are considered feminine while stative verbs are considered masculine (although otherwise Navajo doesn't bother with grammatical gender). I know most Semitic languages have a gender marker in the verb conjugation - you don't even need a pronoun. Many languages have different forms for formal and informal address, as well as indicating social rank, so why not along gender lines too?
Robin Lakoff studied and wrote about gender and language usage in English.
Short answer is that while there isn't a formal
grammatical difference in 'male' versus 'female' language in English as there is some aspects of Japanese, the two sexes do use language differently. However, I think we've established that the term in question isn't one of those breaking points.
Pretty fascinating stuff, actually - worthy of some research and reading. I'm curious to hear if anybody knows or can find if there are other languages that have at least a semi-formal, grammar- based male/female language differences.