This article aims to investigate from (a) Marxist feminist standpoint.
[STRIKE]What[/STRIKE] Which is more appropriate - with 'a' or without 'a'?
The brevity of the investigation doesn't matter. What Tdol is saying is that your sentence feels like there's a missing complement to the word investigate. You need to add what you'll be investigating because investigate is transitive. Besides, it's always a good idea to signal to the reader what they're about to read about.It will take your five minutes to read the investigation.
Will you please explain why it is "take you five" instead of " take your five"?
Although when I was writing the sentence, Grammarly [STRIKE]was suggesting me[/STRIKE] suggested the same, yet I [STRIKE]override[/STRIKE] chose not to follow.
It is helpful when someone [STRIKE]mentioned that it[/STRIKE] says something is odd or wrong, but it [STRIKE]will[/STRIKE] would be more helpful to [STRIKE]if somebody mentions[/STRIKE] give the reason. [STRIKE]behind its oddity and wrong.[/STRIKE]
.Now it is clear to me.
Thanks a lot, emsr2d2.
Whenever I [STRIKE]wrote [/STRIKE] write something, [strike]here[/strike] I [STRIKE]got the [/STRIKE] tend to make mistakes. Although they are not grammatical mistakes, [STRIKE]yet[/STRIKE] they make [STRIKE]the[/STRIKE] a difference [STRIKE]in[/STRIKE] to overall comprehension (the meaning of the sentence) .
Will you please explain why it is "take you five" instead of " take your five"?