[Grammar] United / Unitedly

Status
Not open for further replies.

vpkannan

Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2014
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Tamil
Home Country
India
Current Location
India
Hi,

Which of the following usages is correct?

1. We can fight the election united.
2. We can fight the election unitedly.

Thanks.
 
Only number 1 is correct.
 
'United' is an adjective, and how can it modify the verb 'fight' like an adverb?
 
It modifies "we."
 
You could add a comma to clarify the relationship: We can fight the election, united. "United" modifies we. The reader will understand it the same way with or without one.
 
Try moving 'united' to the beginning of the sentence. Here, the comma is mandatory.
 
The 'united' modifies 'we' if used as suggested by you all. But, how is 'unitedly' wrong in the sentence as an adverb modifying the verb 'verb'? Is it grammatically wrong or just idiomatically wrong?
 
How the word "united" modified the word "we"?
 
Honestly, I cannot think of a sentence where I would use unitedly, and doubt that I have ever used it.
 
NOT A TEACHER


I have found some information that may interest my fellow learners.

1. The two men stood silently/silent.
2. The army was to travel as lightly/light as possible.
3. And Quietly/Quiet Flows the Don (title of a Russian novel; the Don is a river in Russia).


In the opinion of my source:

a. In No. 1, use "silent." Let the silence refer to the standers, not the standing.

b. In No. 2, use "light." Lightness belongs to the army, not to the manner of traveling.

c. In No. 3, the English title correctly uses "quiet." We are talking about the quietness in the river. The verb "flows" is "a mere connective." [my emphasis]

Source: Wilson Follett, Modern American Usage / A Guide (1980).
 
Last edited:
NOT A TEACHER


Thank you, Mr. Wai, for reminding me of the moderator's comment.

I have edited my post so that there are no spaces before or after the slashes.

I want to follow the rules of this website, lest I mislead any of my fellow learners.

*****

I did some googling and wish to share the results.

1. Yes, most authorities tell us that there should be no spaces.

a. He is rich/wealthy.

2. If the items on either side have spaces, then some people do use spaces before and after the slash.

a. He is a folk singer / lyric writer.

3. Most authorities suggest spaces when quoting poetry.


My online sources: quora.com and apvschicago.com.
 
Let the silence refer to the standers, not the standing.

Is it standers / standees?
 
Do you notice post #15?
 
Is it standers / standees?


NOT A TEACHER


Excellent question, Vpkannan.

I have done some googling and would like to share some ideas (not "answers") with you.

1. The word "stander" was used to refer to those two men because they were standing, not sitting. They were "standers," not "sitters."

2. The word "standee" usually applies to people who pay for the privilege of standing.

a. If there are no more seats available at a concert, some places will allow "standees," i.e., people who are allowed to pay for the right to stand somewhere in the hall and watch the concert.

3. Yes, I do believe that sometimes native speakers disagree on which word to use.

a. On a crowded subway car, should we refer to people who are standing as "standers" or "standees"? (I will keep my opinion to myself.)

4. I do believe, however, that referring to those two standing men in my post (#14) as "standees" might be a bit humorous.

a. An interesting fact: If you happen to witness an accident, you will be called a "bystander." (Not a "bystandee.")
 
I have heard standees, but I don't use it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ask a Teacher

If you have a question about the English language and would like to ask one of our many English teachers and language experts, please click the button below to let us know:

(Requires Registration)
Back
Top