[Grammar] We can go to the Alps next month because we're free.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Son Ho

Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2016
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Vietnamese
Home Country
Vietnam
Current Location
Vietnam
I'm quite confused about the differences between may, might, could and can which are used to say things possible even though I have read this part of Practical English Usage by Michael Swan. Could you tell me if sentence 2 is correct or not? If it were correct, must we use may instead of can when we cross out because we're free?


  1. We may go to the Alps next month. (possibility in the future)
  2. We can go to the Alps next month because we're free. (being possible in this situation)
 
Last edited:
I like to think of can as an expression of possibility, and may as an expression of probability. There's a major difference between the two words, and hopefully explaining it will help you understand the difference between can and may.


Possibility is binary. Something is either possible or impossible. There's no gray area. You either can or can't do it.

Probability can be strong, weak, and anything in between. It's a percentage, statistical chance for something to happen. You may do it, but you may not do it just as well. We'll find out in the future.

Can also expresses ability. It says you're competent or skilled enough to do it, that you have enough resources to do it, or that you're capable of doing it. May doesn't express ability.

On top of that, both can and may can express permission, They tell you if you're allowed to do something.

Besides a few other minute differences here and there that I'm not going to go into detail about here, that's the basic distinction between the two, unless I forgot to mention something else obvious but important.

Because there's a bit of overlap in meaning between can and may, you can sometimes use them interchangeably. Sometimes, however, you can't do that. It all depends on what meaning you intend to convey. Usually, it's perfectly understandable for the listener what the speaker meant, but, technically, it's all up to the listener's interpretation, which is crucial for some ages old jokes.


A student asks the teacher "Can I go to the toilet?", asking for permission, but because can can also express ability, the teacher might feel like making a bit of fun of the student, and jokingly reply with "I don't know, can you?", which asks if the student knows how to use the toilet all by themselves. The joke would not work if the student used may instead. "May I go to the toilet?" asks about permission, but not about ability.

A child asks their mother "Mom, can I paint the walls black?", and the mom replies with "Of course you can, honey, but you may not!"

A friend of mine, who worked as a call center operator, had to listen to a half-an-hour long tirade about the importance of the difference between "Hello, my name is XXX. How can/may I help you?" because he had deviated from the script by one word, saying "How can I help you?" instead of "How may I help you?"
That being said, "We may go to the Alps next week" sounds like you haven't decided where you will go next week yet, maybe the Alps, maybe somewhere else, maybe nowhere at all. It's also entirely possible that you're just saying that you're allowed to go there because, for instance, you're all minors who can't make such decisions yourselves yet, and you first needed to ask your parents. Now that they've agreed, you may go to the Alps. In isolation, the sentence can mean either of these things, and it's impossible to tell what you mean without more context.

"We can go to the Alps next week" also sounds like you have the permission to go there. It's also entirely possible that you're saying you're capable of doing that. Maybe the trip is expensive and time-consuming, and you want to communicate that you have enough time and money to do that. Again, it's impossible to tell what you mean without more context.

So, with "(...) because we're free", I'd much rather prefer can. Being free sounds like something that will make you capable of going there, and can is appropriate for expressing that idea. I'm curious if the native speakers of this forum agree with my opinion here.
 
Last edited:
When you use the phrase "next month" you are clearly talking about the near future.

Bob: We might visit the Alps next month.
Ron: You and your wife?
Bob: Yes.
Ron: I'm guessing you still have some details to nail down.
Bob: That's right.
Ron: Maybe you can decide based on where the best skiing is.
Bob: Skiing? No, I haven't broken my leg yet, and I think I'll put that off a little while longer. No, we'll just be sightseeing.
Ron: Well, Italy's a good choice.
Bob: Why is that?
Ron: You get to listen to people speak Italian.
Bob: Good point!
 
  1. We may go to the Alps next month.
  2. We can go to the Alps next month because we're free.

Let me paraphrase the probable different meanings of your sentences:

1. We're considering going to the Alps next month.
2. It would be theoretically possible for us to go to the Alps next month, given that we're free.
 
Last edited:
I'm one of those old-fashioned gals who still generally uses "might" for possibility and "may" for permission.

Alan: Have you decided what you're doing for a holiday this year?
Helen: We might go to the Alps next month.

Dylan: May I get down from the table? I've eaten all my vegetables!
Mum: Yes, you may get down from the table.
 
If it were correct, must we use may instead of can when we cross out because we're free?

No- it's correct without because we're free. However, as always, the context should make it clearer why you have chosen can.
 
Son Ho, please note that in post #3 I did not use the word "free" even once. Why do you think that is?
 
Son Ho, please note that in post #3 I did not use the word "free" even once. Why do you think that is?

Because Bod is not sure that they can go to the Alps or not. They are thinking of many of places to make a decision. I think.
 
Because Bob is not sure [strike]that[/strike] if they can go to the Alps or not.

Nope. There is no reason for him to say he is free to go at a certain time. The context does not justify that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ask a Teacher

If you have a question about the English language and would like to ask one of our many English teachers and language experts, please click the button below to let us know:

(Requires Registration)
Back
Top