We would have considered September claim paid had there been two procedure codes out of four that were paid.

[tufguy]

1) We would have considered September claim paid had there been two procedure codes out of four that were paid.

2) We would have considered September claim paid had there been two procedure codes out of four that had been paid.

My question is when we use "had done, would have done" structure and we continue talking about something then do we use simple past or do we have to continue using "had done"?

 

[emsr2d2]

1) We would have considered the/your September claim paid had there been two procedure codes out of four that were paid.

2) We would have considered the/your September claim paid had there been two procedure codes out of four that had been paid.

My question is when we use a "had done, would have done" structure and we continue talking about something, then do we use the simple past or do we have to continue using "had done"?

Note my corrections above. It's astonishing that after ten years, we're still having to add articles to your sentences!

You need to use sentence 2.

 

[tufguy]

Note my corrections above. It's astonishing that after ten years, we're still having to add articles to your sentences!

You need to use sentence 2.

So we have to continue with "had done". Am I correct?

 

[emsr2d2]

So we have to continue with "had done". Am I correct?

What other conclusion could you possibly come to after I said that you had to use sentence #2?