North and South by Elizabeth Cleghorn GaskellMargaret's face dimpled up into a merry laugh.
Koerg burst in upon them, dimpling all over with merry laughter.
They don't, but why is it a bad suggestion?Dimples don't equal wrinkles so that's a bad suggestion for the OP's question.
Not a teacher
They do indeed.Do they not form a dimple?
Certainly, but I understand that the OP didn't ask about wrinkles but "lines on your face".They do indeed.
However, your quotations are from books written over a century ago. 'Merry laughter' has a somewhat dated ring to me. Whilst I feel that we might still use 'dimpling up in laughter', the words give gives a different picture from 'wrinkling/creasing'. Laughing wrinkles. | Flickr - Photo Sharing!
Certainly, but I understand that the OP didn't ask about wrinkles but "lines on your face"....
I think I do misunderstand the word then. So the dimple is just the "crater proper", not the creases it causes on the face?Dimples aren't lines - they're more like dents. They can be temporary - appearing when people laugh or smile. (They can also be permanent - I have one on my chin. And because the skin around the 'crater' is not flat, creases can be caused around them when the shape of the face changes. But this is not the sort of dimple we are talking about.)
No, indeed! The 'all over' is an intentional exaggeration, rather like 'to bits' in the (Br Eng) expression 'chuffed to bits' (meaning very pleased). Koerg just smiled a lot, forming a number of dimples.I think I do misunderstand the word then. So the dimple is just the "crater proper", not the creases it causes on the face?
But then, what does it mean to "dimple all over"? I don't think Koerg looked like this.
If you have a question about the English language and would like to ask one of our many English teachers and language experts, please click the button below to let us know: