which also saw a plane

[Maybo]

They cite an Aeroflot accident in 2019, which also saw a plane burst into flames on landing in Moscow, killing 41 out of 73 onboard, as a similar incident to Tuesday’s, which has been learned from.

Source: How safety rules ‘written in blood’ saved lives in Tokyo plane crash by Julia Buckley

Who saw it? Does "saw" mean "experienced"?

 

[tedmc]

Nobody saw anything. "Saw" in the context means "witnessed". The accident witnessed a plane bursting into flames. See meaning #16 here: https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/see_1

 

[teechar]

In that sense, "see" means "during which something happened".

 

[emsr2d2]

Source: How safety rules ‘written in blood’ saved lives in Tokyo plane crash by Julia Buckley

That's not sufficient. We need the name of the publication/website in/on which the article appeared, not just the title of the article.

 

[Amigos4]

The original article by Julia Buckley can be found at https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/02/travel/tokyo-plane-crash-safety-rules-analysis-intl/index.html.

In the OP, it is not clear who “They” are. I would leave out “which has been learned from.”

They Authorities cite an Aeroflot accident in 2019, which also saw a plane burst into flames on landing in Moscow, killing 41 out of 73 onboard, as a similar incident to Tuesday’s crash. which has been learned from.

 

[emsr2d2]

@Amigos4 Thanks for providing the source but, in future, please leave it to the OP to provide it. We need all users to get into the habit of providing the source in post #1.

 

[Maybo]

@Amigos4 Thanks for providing the source but, in future, please leave it to the OP to provide it. We need all users to get into the habit of providing the source in post #1.

I already inserted the link into the text title.

 

[emsr2d2]

I already inserted the link into the text title.

It saves a lot of time for everyone if you simply name the publication. We shouldn't have to click on an external link to get the source.

 

[Maybo]

It saves a lot of time for everyone if you simply name the publication. We shouldn't have to click on an external link to get the source.

Do you mean CNN? I didn’t know the rule recently changed.

 

[emsr2d2]

Do you mean CNN? I didn’t know the rule recently changed.

The rules haven't changed. They have always been the same. If you take something from a newspaper, you must name the newspaper (you can name the journalist as well if you like). If it's from a book, name the book and the author. If it's from a TV series, name the series. If it's from a film, name the film. If it's from a website, name the website.
Most of us prefer that the information be given directly, always in post #1, rather than being expected to click on a link.