given to me vs given me

Status
Not open for further replies.

CarloSsS

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Czech
Home Country
Czech Republic
Current Location
Czech Republic
The money was given (to) me.

According to my teacher, in the sentence above, you can omit the preposition "to". Without the preposition, the sentence sounds somewhat strange and unnatural to me. How does it sound to you? Do you think you may (have) use(d) such a structure?

The money was given me. vs The money was given to me.
 
(Not teacher)

Omission of 'to' makes the sentence incomplete, that's what I think!
 
The money was given (to) me.

According to my teacher, in the sentence above, you can omit the preposition "to". Without the preposition, the sentence sounds somewhat strange and unnatural to me. How does it sound to you? Do you think you may (have) use(d) such a structure?

The money was given me. vs The money was given to me.

It's fine.
 
These are both grammatically correct. Without the preposition 'to' the register is raised slightly so it sounds a bit more formal but it functionally makes no difference at all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ask a Teacher

If you have a question about the English language and would like to ask one of our many English teachers and language experts, please click the button below to let us know:

(Requires Registration)
Back
Top