given to me vs given me

Status
Not open for further replies.

CarloSsS

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Czech
Home Country
Czech Republic
Current Location
Czech Republic
The money was given (to) me.

According to my teacher, in the sentence above, you can omit the preposition "to". Without the preposition, the sentence sounds somewhat strange and unnatural to me. How does it sound to you? Do you think you may (have) use(d) such a structure?

The money was given me. vs The money was given to me.
 

Huda-M

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Urdu
Home Country
Pakistan
Current Location
Pakistan
(Not teacher)

Omission of 'to' makes the sentence incomplete, that's what I think!
 

bhaisahab

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
Ireland
The money was given (to) me.

According to my teacher, in the sentence above, you can omit the preposition "to". Without the preposition, the sentence sounds somewhat strange and unnatural to me. How does it sound to you? Do you think you may (have) use(d) such a structure?

The money was given me. vs The money was given to me.

It's fine.
 

robbarron

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2013
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
These are both grammatically correct. Without the preposition 'to' the register is raised slightly so it sounds a bit more formal but it functionally makes no difference at all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top