Exciting news! With our new Ad-Free Premium Subscription you can enjoy a distraction-free browsing experience while supporting our site's growth. Without ads, you have less distractions and enjoy faster page load times. Upgrade is optional. Find out more here, and enjoy ad-free learning with us!
When the thing reported is introduced by a past-tense verb of speech, backshifting is always correct. However, if the situation reported is still true, then backshifting is not essential.
On Monday, John says to Peter, "I am going to France on Wednesday",
On Tuesday, Peter reports: John told me he was/is going to France tomorrow/on Wednesday.
On Thursday, Peter reports: John told me he was[STRIKE]/is[/STRIKE] going to France yesterday/on Weednesday.
Thank you very much.
I hope that there are no other cases of using present tense in subordinate clauses when using past tense in main clauses, exept in the case of universal truth and the case of which you've told me.
I just wonder why the things you've just explained me are not written anywhere. At least I couldn't have found them.
Oh, but they are. The first grammar I picked from my shelf , Quirk et al (1985.187-8) says:
"In Indirect Speech [...] the past tense in the reporting verb tends to make the verb of the subordinate clause past tense as well. This phenomenom, known as backshift, is normally optional [...]" (my emphasis added).
Leech (2004.108) writes, of avoiding backshifting:
"The implication of this avoidance of backshifting is that the time of the original utterance ('then') and the time of the of report ('now') are both included within the time-span during which the statement in the reported clause remains valid."